Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:51:13 +0100 | From | Maxime Ripard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] thermal: sun8i: Use bitmap API instead of open code |
| |
Hi Frank,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:58:36PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote: > From: Yangtao Li <frank@allwinnertech.com> > > Thw bitmap_* API is the standard way to access data in the bitfield. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank@allwinnertech.com> > --- > drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c > index f8b13071a6f4..f2e4a4f18101 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > * Based on the work of Josef Gajdusek <atx@atx.name> > */ > > +#include <linux/bitmap.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/device.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ struct ths_thermal_chip { > int (*calibrate)(struct ths_device *tmdev, > u16 *caldata, int callen); > int (*init)(struct ths_device *tmdev); > - int (*irq_ack)(struct ths_device *tmdev); > + void (*irq_ack)(struct ths_device *tmdev); > int (*calc_temp)(struct ths_device *tmdev, > int id, int reg); > }; > @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ struct ths_thermal_chip { > struct ths_device { > const struct ths_thermal_chip *chip; > struct device *dev; > + DECLARE_BITMAP(irq_bitmap, MAX_SENSOR_NUM); > struct regmap *regmap; > struct reset_control *reset; > struct clk *bus_clk; > @@ -146,9 +148,11 @@ static const struct regmap_config config = { > .max_register = 0xfc, > }; > > -static int sun8i_h3_irq_ack(struct ths_device *tmdev) > +static void sun8i_h3_irq_ack(struct ths_device *tmdev) > { > - int i, state, ret = 0; > + int i, state; > + > + bitmap_zero(tmdev->irq_bitmap, tmdev->chip->sensor_num); > > regmap_read(tmdev->regmap, SUN8I_THS_IS, &state); > > @@ -156,16 +160,16 @@ static int sun8i_h3_irq_ack(struct ths_device *tmdev) > if (state & SUN8I_THS_DATA_IRQ_STS(i)) { > regmap_write(tmdev->regmap, SUN8I_THS_IS, > SUN8I_THS_DATA_IRQ_STS(i)); > - ret |= BIT(i); > + bitmap_set(tmdev->irq_bitmap, i, 1); > } > } > - > - return ret; > } > > -static int sun50i_h6_irq_ack(struct ths_device *tmdev) > +static void sun50i_h6_irq_ack(struct ths_device *tmdev) > { > - int i, state, ret = 0; > + int i, state; > + > + bitmap_zero(tmdev->irq_bitmap, tmdev->chip->sensor_num); > > regmap_read(tmdev->regmap, SUN50I_H6_THS_DIS, &state); > > @@ -173,24 +177,21 @@ static int sun50i_h6_irq_ack(struct ths_device *tmdev) > if (state & SUN50I_H6_THS_DATA_IRQ_STS(i)) { > regmap_write(tmdev->regmap, SUN50I_H6_THS_DIS, > SUN50I_H6_THS_DATA_IRQ_STS(i)); > - ret |= BIT(i); > + bitmap_set(tmdev->irq_bitmap, i, 1); > } > } > - > - return ret;
The bitfield of the acked interrupts is mostly something internal to the handler, so I'm not really convinced about sharing that through the global structure.
With that being said...
> } > > static irqreturn_t sun8i_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > { > struct ths_device *tmdev = data; > - int i, state; > + int i; > > - state = tmdev->chip->irq_ack(tmdev); > + tmdev->chip->irq_ack(tmdev); > > - for (i = 0; i < tmdev->chip->sensor_num; i++) { > - if (state & BIT(i)) > - thermal_zone_device_update(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd, > - THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > + for_each_set_bit(i, tmdev->irq_bitmap, tmdev->chip->sensor_num) { > + thermal_zone_device_update(tmdev->sensor[i].tzd, > + THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
.. for_each_set_bit is definitely cleaner and more readable.
Since it can operate on any unsigned long pointer, maybe we can just make irq_ack return an unsigned long, and iterate over it here?
Maxime [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |