Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE | From | Auger Eric <> | Date | Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:04:05 +0100 |
| |
Hi Shameer,
On 10/27/20 1:20 PM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > Hi Eric, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: iommu [mailto:iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of >> Auger Eric >> Sent: 23 September 2020 12:47 >> To: yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; >> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; joro@8bytes.org; >> alex.williamson@redhat.com; jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com; >> yi.l.liu@intel.com; robin.murphy@arm.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE > > ... > >>> Besides, before going through the whole series [1][2], I'd like to >>> know if this is the latest version of your Nested-Stage-Setup work in >>> case I had missed something. >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320161911.27494-1-eric.auger@redhat.com >>> [2] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414150607.28488-1-eric.auger@redhat.com >> >> yes those 2 series are the last ones. Thank you for reviewing. >> >> FYI, I intend to respin within a week or 2 on top of Jacob's [PATCH v10 0/7] >> IOMMU user API enhancement. > > Thanks for that. Also is there any plan to respin the related Qemu series as well? > I know dual stage interface proposals are still under discussion, but it would be > nice to have a testable solution based on new interfaces for ARM64 as well. > Happy to help with any tests or verifications.
Yes the QEMU series will be respinned as well. That's on the top of my todo list right now.
Thanks
Eric > > Please let me know. > > Thanks, > Shameer > >
| |