lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] checkpatch: fix false positives in REPEATED_WORD warning
From
Date
On 24/10/20 9:03 pm, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 18:54 +0530, Aditya wrote:
>>> Would you like to work on
>>> further rules that can be improved with your evaluation approach?
>>
>> Yes, I would like work on further rules.
>
> Some generic ideas:
>
> How about working to reduce runtime and complexity by
> making the rules extensible or separable at startup.
>
> Maybe move each existing rules into a separate
> directory as an individual file and aggregate them at
> checkpatch startup.
>
> Maybe look at the existing rules that do not have a
> $fix option and add them as appropriate.
>
> You could fix the multiline indentation where the
> current warning and fix is only for a single line
>
> value = function(arg1,
> arg2,
> arg3);
>
> where checkpatch emits only single warning and fix
> for the line with arg2, but not the line with arg3);
>
> Maybe try to make the coding styles supported more
> flexible:
>
> Allow braces in different places, support different
> tab indentation sizes, spacing rules around operators,
> function definition layouts, etc.
>
>
>

Thanks for all these suggestions. I'll make observations regarding
these and get back to you :)

Aditya

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-24 20:13    [W:0.062 / U:0.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site