Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:54:25 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 11:51 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:42 AM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 12:42 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > We probably should add all 3 to W=2 builds (wrapped in cc-option). > > > I've filed https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1180 to > > > follow up on. > > > > I suggest using W=1 as people that are doing cleanups > > generally use that and not W=123 or any other style. > > > > Every other use of W= is still quite noisy and these > > code warnings are relatively trivially to fix up. > > The 0day bot folks have enabled W=1 recently; hence the uptick in > reports of -Wimplicit-function-declaration. > > If it gets added to W=1, it's effectively "on by default" for new code > tested by 0day bot.
And that would mean these get fixed faster no? Isn't that a good thing?
| |