lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From
Date
On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 11:51 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:42 AM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 12:42 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > We probably should add all 3 to W=2 builds (wrapped in cc-option).
> > > I've filed https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1180 to
> > > follow up on.
> >
> > I suggest using W=1 as people that are doing cleanups
> > generally use that and not W=123 or any other style.
> >
> > Every other use of W= is still quite noisy and these
> > code warnings are relatively trivially to fix up.
>
> The 0day bot folks have enabled W=1 recently; hence the uptick in
> reports of -Wimplicit-function-declaration.
>
> If it gets added to W=1, it's effectively "on by default" for new code
> tested by 0day bot.

And that would mean these get fixed faster no?
Isn't that a good thing?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-20 20:55    [W:0.039 / U:1.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site