lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] pciehp: Add check for DL_ACTIVE bit in pciehp_check_link_status()
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Sanjay R Mehta <Sanju.Mehta@amd.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@amd.com>
>
> if DL_ACTIVE bit is set it means that there is no need to check
> PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT bit, as DL_ACTIVE would have set only if the link
> is already trained. Hence adding a check which takes care of this
> scenario.
Sorry, I couldn't understand the logic here. if DL_ACTIVE was set,
PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT is to be cleared, vice versa. why need

(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT) &&
!(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)

Double safe ?

Thanks,
Ethan

>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 53433b37e181..8ab2f6a2f388 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,8 @@ int pciehp_check_link_status(struct controller *ctrl)
>
> pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
> ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s: lnk_status = %x\n", __func__, lnk_status);
> - if ((lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT) ||
> + if (((lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT) &&
> + !(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)) ||
> !(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW)) {
> ctrl_err(ctrl, "link training error: status %#06x\n",
> lnk_status);
> --
> 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-20 10:33    [W:0.062 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site