Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:05:49 +0200 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] bus/fsl-mc: Extend mc-bus driver functionalities in preparation for mc-bus VFIO support |
| |
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:56:52PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 10/2/2020 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:06:41PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote: > >>> The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the > >>> mc-bus driver like: > >>> - a way to reset the DPRC container > >>> - driver_override support > >>> - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC > >>> - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the > >>> interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace > >>> request > >>> > >>> v4 -> v5 > >>> - dprc_celanup should not fail > >>> > >>> v3 -> v4 > >>> - Rebased on the latest kernel. > >>> - Exported a dprc_remove function > >>> > >>> v2 -> v3 > >>> - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region > >>> - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines > >>> > >>> v1 -> v2 > >>> - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions > >>> - Cache the DPRC API version > >>> > >>> The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC > >>> devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting > >>> different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes > >>> when addressing the VFIO review comments. > >>> > >>> The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override > >>> in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and > >>> address that separately. > >>> > >>> Bharat Bhushan (3): > >>> bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit > >>> > >>> Diana Craciun (10): > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside > >>> dprc_scan_objects > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by > >>> multiple entities > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function > >>> bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO > >>> bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command > >>> > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++---------- > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c | 141 +++++++++++++++---- > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c | 12 +- > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c | 64 ++++++++- > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h | 31 ++--- > >>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c | 7 +- > >>> include/linux/fsl/mc.h | 41 +++++- > >>> 7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) > >>> > >> > >> For the series: > >> Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> > >> Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> > > > > Do you want me to take these patches in my tree, or are they going to > > Linus some other way? > > I'm prefectly fine with you picking up the patches through your tree.
Great, now queued up.
greg k-h
| |