Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/7] of: base: Add of_count_phandle_with_fixed_args() | From | Richard Fitzgerald <> | Date | Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:10:16 +0100 |
| |
On 15/10/2020 17:52, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2020-10-14 19:39, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:54 AM Richard Fitzgerald >> <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote: >>> >>> Add an equivalent of of_count_phandle_with_args() for fixed argument >>> sets, to pair with of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/of/base.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/linux/of.h | 9 +++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c >>> index ea44fea99813..45d8b0e65345 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c >>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c >>> @@ -1772,6 +1772,48 @@ int of_count_phandle_with_args(const struct >>> device_node *np, const char *list_na >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_count_phandle_with_args); >>> >>> +/** >>> + * of_count_phandle_with_fixed_args() - Find the number of phandles >>> references in a property >>> + * @np: pointer to a device tree node containing a list >>> + * @list_name: property name that contains a list >>> + * @cell_count: number of argument cells following the phandle >>> + * >>> + * Returns the number of phandle + argument tuples within a >>> property. It >>> + * is a typical pattern to encode a list of phandle and variable >>> + * arguments into a single property. >>> + */ >>> +int of_count_phandle_with_fixed_args(const struct device_node *np, >>> + const char *list_name, >>> + int cells_count) >>> +{ >> >> Looks to me like you can refactor of_count_phandle_with_args to handle >> both case and then make this and of_count_phandle_with_args simple >> wrapper functions. > > Although for just counting the number of phandles each with n arguments > that a property contains, isn't that simply a case of dividing the > property length by n + 1? The phandles themselves will be validated by > any subsequent of_parse_phandle*() call anyway, so there doesn't seem > much point in doing more work then necessary here. >
As I'm not a DT expert, I'm reluctant to change existing algorithms that could break everything just for the trivial case of adding a fixed arguments count. I have a re-worked patch as suggested by Rob that re-uses the existing counting function for both cases.
>>> + struct of_phandle_iterator it; >>> + int rc, cur_index = 0; >>> + >>> + if (!cells_count) { >>> + const __be32 *list; >>> + int size; >>> + >>> + list = of_get_property(np, list_name, &size); >>> + if (!list) >>> + return -ENOENT; >>> + >>> + return size / sizeof(*list); > > Case in point - if it's OK to do exactly that for n == 0, then clearly > we're *aren't* fussed about validating anything, so the n > 0 code below > is nothing more than a massively expensive way to check for a nonzero > remainder :/ > > Robin. > >>> + } >>> + >>> + rc = of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, list_name, NULL, >>> cells_count); >>> + if (rc) >>> + return rc; >>> + >>> + while ((rc = of_phandle_iterator_next(&it)) == 0) >>> + cur_index += 1; >>> + >>> + if (rc != -ENOENT) >>> + return rc; >>> + >>> + return cur_index; >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_count_phandle_with_fixed_args); >>> + >>> /** >>> * __of_add_property - Add a property to a node without lock >>> operations >>> */ >>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h >>> index 5cf7ae0465d1..9f315da4e9da 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/of.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h >>> @@ -377,6 +377,8 @@ extern int of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(const >>> struct device_node *np, >>> struct of_phandle_args *out_args); >>> extern int of_count_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, >>> const char *list_name, const char *cells_name); >>> +extern int of_count_phandle_with_fixed_args(const struct device_node >>> *np, >>> + const char *list_name, int cells_count); >>> >>> /* phandle iterator functions */ >>> extern int of_phandle_iterator_init(struct of_phandle_iterator *it, >>> @@ -886,6 +888,13 @@ static inline int >>> of_count_phandle_with_args(struct device_node *np, >>> return -ENOSYS; >>> } >>> >>> +static inline int of_count_phandle_with_fixed_args(const struct >>> device_node *np, >>> + const char >>> *list_name, >>> + int cells_count) >>> +{ >>> + return -ENOSYS; >>> +} >>> + >>> static inline int of_phandle_iterator_init(struct >>> of_phandle_iterator *it, >>> const struct device_node >>> *np, >>> const char *list_name, >>> -- >>> 2.20.1 >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >>
| |