Messages in this thread | | | From | Jason Andryuk <> | Date | Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:52:38 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen: Kconfig: nest Xen guest options |
| |
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:42 AM Jürgen Groß <jgross@suse.com> wrote: > > On 14.10.20 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > Moving XEN_512GB allows it to nest under XEN_PV. That also allows > > XEN_PVH to nest under XEN as a sibling to XEN_PV and XEN_PVHVM giving: > > > > [*] Xen guest support > > [*] Xen PV guest support > > [*] Limit Xen pv-domain memory to 512GB > > [*] Xen PV Dom0 support > > This has currently a wrong text/semantics: > > It should be split to CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 and CONFIG_XEN_PV_DOM0. > > Otherwise the backends won't be enabled per default for a PVH-only > config meant to be Dom0-capable. > > You don't have to do that in your patches if you don't want to, but > I wanted to mention it with you touching this area of Kconfig.
Yes, good point. I had not considered that.
> > [*] Xen PVHVM guest support > > [*] Xen PVH guest support > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com> > > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Thanks, Jason
| |