Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:57:20 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] tools: docs: memory-model: fix references for some files |
| |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 06:58:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:38:36PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 09:33:54AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:14:29PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > - The sysfs.txt file was converted to ReST and renamed; > > > > - The control-dependencies.txt is not at > > > > Documentation/control-dependencies.txt. As it is at the > > > > same dir as the README file, which mentions it, just > > > > remove Documentation/. > > > > > > > > With that, ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check script > > > > is now happy again for files under tools/. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> > > > > > > Queued for review and testing, likely target v5.11. > > > > Instead of changing the path in the README reference, shouldn't > > tools/memory-model/control-dependencies.txt be moved to its proper > > position in .../Documentation? > > You are of course quite right. My thought is to let Mauro go ahead, > given his short deadline. We can then make this "git mv" change once > v5.10-rc1 comes out, given that it should have Mauro's patches. I have > added a reminder to my calendar.
Except that I cannot find a commit where control-dependencies.txt is in tools/memory-model. And this file is not yet in mainline, but only in -rcu and -next. In both places, it is here:
tools/memory-model/Documentation/control-dependencies.txt
Mauro, to what commit in what tree are you applying this patch?
Thanx, Paul
| |