Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:52:17 -0700 | From | Bhaumik Bhatt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 04/10] bus: mhi: core: Use the IRQF_ONESHOT flag for the BHI interrupt line |
| |
On 2020-10-09 09:04, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > On 10/9/2020 9:57 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 07:02:29PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: >>> Remove the IRQF_SHARED flag as it is not needed for the BHI interrupt >>> and replace it with IRQF_ONESHOT so that host can be sure that the >>> next BHI hard interrupt is triggered only when the threaded interrupt >>> handler has returned. This is to avoid any race conditions we may run >>> into if BHI interrupts fire one after another. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c >>> b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c >>> index ca32563..9ae4c19 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c >>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c >>> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ int mhi_init_irq_setup(struct mhi_controller >>> *mhi_cntrl) >>> /* Setup BHI_INTVEC IRQ */ >>> ret = request_threaded_irq(mhi_cntrl->irq[0], mhi_intvec_handler, >>> mhi_intvec_threaded_handler, >>> - IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, >>> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, >> >> Jeff, I believe you're the one requested for shared irq during initial >> push. >> Are you okay with this? > > Nope :) > > AIC100 has a single interrupt for BHI/MHI activity, so this needs to be > shared.
Did not account for this. Will drop this patch.
Thanks, Bhaumik
-- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |