lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 07/15] dt-bindings: clock: Fix qcom,gpucc bindings for sdm845/sc7180/msm8998
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:12 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> The qcom,gpucc bindings had a few problems with them:
>
> 1. When things were converted to yaml the name of the "gpll0 main"
> clock got changed from "gpll0" to "gpll0_main". Change it back for
> msm8998.
>
> 2. Apparently there is a push not to use purist aliases for clocks but
> instead to just use the internal Qualcomm names. For sdm845 and
> sc7180 (where the drivers haven't already been changed) move in
> this direction.
>
> Things were also getting complicated harder to deal with by jamming
> several SoCs into one file. Splitting simplifies things.
>
> Fixes: 5c6f3a36b913 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for the QCOM GPUCC clock bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Added pointer to inlude file in description.
> - Everyone but msm8998 now uses internal QC names.
> - Fixed typo grpahics => graphics
> - Split bindings into 3 files.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Patch ("dt-bindings: clock: Fix qcom,gpucc...") new for v2.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml | 72 -------------------
> .../bindings/clock/qcom,msm8998-gpucc.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-gpucc.yaml | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-gpucc.yaml | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,msm8998-gpucc.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-gpucc.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-gpucc.yaml

I'm not seeing any differences in sdm845 and sc7180. Do those really
need to be separate? It doesn't have to be all combined or all
separate.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-31 17:44    [W:0.345 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site