Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] seq_file .next functions should increase position index | From | Vasily Averin <> | Date | Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:27:27 +0300 |
| |
On 1/24/20 6:50 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:36 +0300 > Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > >> >> I've sent patches into maillists of affected subsystems already, >> this patch-set fixes the problem in files related to >> pstore, tracing, gcov, sysvipc and other subsystems processed >> via linux-kernel@ mailing list directly > > Since you sent the patches out individually, and not as the usually way > of replying to the 0/7 patch (this email), do you expect the patches to > just be accepted by the individual maintainers, and not as a series?
Yes, you are right, I've missed it. Could you please review tracing-related patches of this patch set?
>> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 >> >> Vasily Averin (7): >> pstore_ftrace_seq_next should increase position index >> gcov_seq_next should increase position index >> t_next should increase position index >> fpid_next should increase position index >> eval_map_next should increase position index >> trigger_next should increase position index >> sysvipc_find_ipc should increase position index >> >> fs/pstore/inode.c | 2 +- >> ipc/util.c | 2 +- >> kernel/gcov/fs.c | 2 +- >> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 9 ++++++--- >> kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 +--- >> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 5 +++-- >> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >
| |