Messages in this thread | | | From | Steve Grubb <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH ghak28 V4] audit: log audit netlink multicast bind and unbind events | Date | Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:11:42 -0500 |
| |
On Thursday, January 23, 2020 11:13:49 AM EST Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > Steve, can you say why this order should be the standard? From: > http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/record-fields.html
The majority of events go down the path of: pid,uid,auid,ses,subj,op,comm,exe,res
Which lands on the parse_user() function.
If for some reason we really wanted to stay on a "kernel" parser, then I'd recommend: auid,uid,ses,subj,pid,comm,exe,op,res
which lands on the parse_kernel_anom() function.
Either of those have complete information and requires no syscall record.
-Steve
> I get: > SYSCALL/ANOM_LINK/FEATURE_CHANGE > ppid pid auid uid gid euid suid > fsuid egid sgid fsgid tty ses comm exe subj > ANOM_ABEND/SECCOMP > auid uid gid ses subj pid > comm exe LOGIN > pid uid subj old-auid auid tty > old-ses ses SYSTEM_BOOT/SYSTEM_SHUTDOWN > pid uid auid ses subj comm exe > USER_LOGIN > pid uid auid ses subj uid exe > DAEMON_START > auid pid uid ses subj > DAEMON_CONFIG/DAEMON_END > auid pid subj > ANOM_PROMISCUOUS > auid uid gid ses > 52msgs > pid uid auid ses subj * > CONFIG_CHANGE > auid ses subj > > This new record is: > EVENT_LISTENER > pid uid auid tty ses subj comm exe > > And using the search criteria following, I get no other matches: > /pid.*uid.*auid.*tty.*ses.*subj.*comm.*exe > so this appears to be a new field order.
| |