lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 4.19.98
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:37:18AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH (2020-01-23 09:28:32)
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 08:54:45AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Greg KH (2020-01-23 08:46:32)
> > > > I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.98 kernel.
> > >
> > > commit 3e6b472f474accf757e107919f8ee42e7315ac0d
> > > Author: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> > > Date: Wed Nov 14 09:55:40 2018 -0800
> > >
> > > efi: Fix debugobjects warning on 'efi_rts_work'
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit ef1491e791308317bb9851a0ad380c4a68b58d54 ]
> > >
> > > The following commit:
> > >
> > > 9dbbedaa6171 ("efi: Make efi_rts_work accessible to efi page fault handler")
> > >
> > > converted 'efi_rts_work' from an auto variable to a global variable.
> > > However, when submitting the work, INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() was still used,
> > > causing the following complaint from debugobjects:
> > >
> > > ODEBUG: object 00000000ed27b500 is NOT on stack 00000000c7d38760, but annotated.
> > >
> > > Change the macro to just INIT_WORK() to eliminate the warning.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > > Acked-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
> > > Fixes: 9dbbedaa6171 ("efi: Make efi_rts_work accessible to efi page fault handler")
> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181114175544.12860-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > was incorrectly applied to v4.19.41 and causes lockdep complaints for
> > > the onstack efi_rts_work being initialised by INIT_WORK().
> >
> > Incorrectly how? Fuzz off, or it shouldn't be applied at all? Should
> > this be reverted, or just fixed up, and if fixed up, do you have a patch
> > to fix it?
>
> Just reverted. It applies to 9dbbedaa6171 which moved the efi_rts_work
> off the stack, but is not in v4.19.y, so efi_rts_work is still a local
> and needs the INIT_WORK_ONSTACK annotation.

Ok, thanks, will go revert this and push out a new release with that
fix, thanks for letting me know.

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-23 10:45    [W:0.041 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site