lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout
Hey Bjorn,

Thanks for the review!

On 2020-01-21 00:54, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 17 Jan 05:51 PST 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>
>> Replace the loop for HALT_ACK detection with regmap_read_poll_timeout.

sry missed it, will include it
in the next re-spin

>>
>
> Nice, but we should be able to do the same in q6v5proc_halt_axi_port()?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 16 ++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> index 51f451311f5fc..f20b39c6ff0ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>> #define NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT BIT(2)
>>
>> #define HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 100
>> +#define NAV_HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_US 200
>>
>> /* QDSP6SS_RESET */
>> #define Q6SS_STOP_CORE BIT(0)
>> @@ -746,7 +747,6 @@ static void q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(struct q6v5
>> *qproc,
>> struct regmap *halt_map,
>> u32 offset)
>> {
>> - unsigned long timeout;
>> unsigned int val;
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -760,15 +760,11 @@ static void q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(struct
>> q6v5 *qproc,
>> NAV_AXI_HALTREQ_BIT);
>>
>> /* Wait for halt ack*/
>> - timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> - for (;;) {
>> - ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
>> - if (ret || (val & NAV_AXI_HALTACK_BIT) ||
>> - time_after(jiffies, timeout))
>> - break;
>> -
>> - udelay(5);
>> - }
>> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(halt_map, offset, val,
>> + (val & NAV_AXI_HALTACK_BIT),
>> + 5, NAV_HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_US);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(qproc->dev, "nav halt ack timeout\n");
>
> Is there a case where this new print adds value beyond the printout we
> already have for the case of IDLE_BIT not going high? Can we simply
> ignore the return value and skip the print?

yes we can skip the print

>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>>
>> ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
>> if (ret || !(val & NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT))
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>> Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-22 07:19    [W:0.062 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site