Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Douglas RAILLARD <> | Subject | [RFC PATCH v4 3/6] sched/cpufreq: Hook em_pd_get_higher_power() into get_next_freq() | Date | Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:35:35 +0000 |
| |
Choose the highest OPP for a given energy cost, allowing to skip lower frequencies that would not be cheaper in terms of consumed power. These frequencies can still be interesting to keep in the energy model to give more freedom to thermal throttling, but should not be selected under normal circumstances.
This also prepares the ground for energy-aware frequency boosting.
Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com> --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 09e284dc918a..608963da4916 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include "sched.h" +#include <linux/energy_model.h> #include <linux/sched/cpufreq.h> #include <trace/events/power.h> @@ -210,9 +211,16 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur; + struct em_perf_domain *pd = sugov_policy_get_pd(sg_policy); freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max); + /* + * Try to get a higher frequency if one is available, given the extra + * power we are ready to spend. + */ + freq = em_pd_get_higher_freq(pd, freq, 0); + if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && !sg_policy->need_freq_update) return sg_policy->next_freq; -- 2.24.1
| |