Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:47:43 -0800 | From | Olof Johansson <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] soc/fsl drivers changes for next(v5.6) |
| |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:14:07PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:19:11PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: > > > Hi soc maintainers, > > > > > > Please merge the following new changes for soc/fsl drivers. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a: > > > > > > Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leo/linux.git tags/soc-fsl-next-v5.6 > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6e62bd36e9ad85a22d92b1adce6a0336ea549733: > > > > > > soc: fsl: qe: remove set but not used variable 'mm_gc' (2020-01-08 16:02:48 -0600) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > NXP/FSL SoC driver updates for v5.6 > > > > > > QUICC Engine drivers > > > - Improve the QE drivers to be compatible with ARM/ARM64/PPC64 > > > architectures > > > - Various cleanups to the QE drivers > > > > This branch contains a cross-section of drivers, including those who are > > normally sent to other maintainers/subsystems. I don't see dependencies that > > make them a requirement/easier to merge through the SoC tree at this time -- > > for example the ucc_uart driver updates are mostly independent cleanups. > > > > Am I missing some aspect here, or should those just be merged through > > drivers/tty as other driver changes there? At the very least, we expect drivers > > that aren't merged through the normal path to have acks from those maintainers. > > > > Mind following up on that? Thanks! > > Hi Olof, > > Some of the driver cleanups are dependent to core QE changes. Some > maybe not but could have contextual dependency with other patches. I > will be easier to have them all go in from the same place. We have > collected the ack and confirmation from all the related maintainers. > For the ucc_uart it is not a formal ack. Quoted the confirmation from > Greg below:
Ok, getting that in the pull request (tag) would be useful for future cases.
Merging. Thanks!
-Olof
| |