Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:23:33 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: dw: Add basic runtime PM support |
| |
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:14:54PM +0000, Gareth Williams wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2019 at 14:31:32AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This makes it > > easier for people to identify relevant patches. This isn't even consistent > > within the series :(
> Sorry about that, I will correct the subject lines for V3.
Don't worry about it unless you need to send a v3 for some other reason.
> Is there a set convention for the subsystem I should follow in future? > Or should I follow the style of the individual files I work on?
Following the style for the file/directory is generally a good guide, for SPI I tend to prefer spi: but I just moan about it rather than block anything for it (unless I do end up missing the patch in my inbox). [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |