lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RESEND] vmscan.c: add a sysctl entry for controlling memory reclaim IO congestion_wait length
From
Date


On 9/18/19 20:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Please do not post a new version with a minor compile fixes until there
> is a general agreement on the approach. Willy had comments which really
> need to be resolved first.

Sorry, but thanks for pointing out.

>
> Also does this
> [...]
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot<lkp@intel.com>
> really hold? Because it suggests that the problem has been spotted by
> the kbuild bot which is kinda unexpected... I suspect you have just
> added that for the minor compilation issue that you have fixed since the
> last version.

Yes, I do know the issue is not reported by the robot, but
just followed the kbuild robot tip, this Reported-by suggested by kbuild robot
seems a little misleading, I'm not sure if it has other meanings.
'If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>'

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-19 03:34    [W:0.042 / U:2.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site