lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu: add support for drivers that manage iommu explicitly
From
Date
On 10/09/2019 16:34, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 1:14 AM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:44:01PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
>>>
>>> mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
>>> list_add_tail(&device->list, &group->devices);
>>> - if (group->domain)
>>> + if (group->domain && !(dev->driver && dev->driver->driver_manages_iommu))
>>
>> Hmm, this code usually runs at enumeration time when no driver is
>> attached to the device. Actually it would be pretty dangerous when this
>> code runs while a driver is attached to the device. How does that change
>> make things work for you?
>>
>
> I was seeing this get called via the path driver_probe_device() ->
> platform_dma_configure() -> of_dma_configure() -> of_iommu_configure()
> -> iommu_probe_device() -> ...
>
> The only cases I was seeing where dev->driver is NULL where a few
> places that drivers call of_dma_configure() on their own sub-devices.
> But maybe there are some other paths that I did not notice?

For the of_iommu flow, it very much depends on your DT layout and driver
probe order as to whether you catch the "proper" call from
iommu_bus_notifier()/iommu_bus_init() or the late "replay" from
of_iommu_configure(). I wouldn't make any assumptions of consistency.

Robin.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-10 18:53    [W:0.039 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site