Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Aug 2019 18:34:20 +0100 | From | Marc Zyngier <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: Provide a PV_TIME device to user space |
| |
On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:51:13 +0100 Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
[forgot that one]
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:50:14 +0100 > Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> > +static int __init kvm_pvtime_init(void) > > +{ > > + kvm_register_device_ops(&pvtime_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +late_initcall(kvm_pvtime_init);
Why is it an initcall? So far, the only initcall we've used is the one that initializes KVM itself. Can't we just the device_ops just like we do for the vgic?
M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
| |