Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:04:42 -0700 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as legacy SBI. |
| |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:03:04AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER 0x0 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CLEAR_IPI 0x3 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SEND_IPI 0x4 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_FENCE_I 0x5 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 0x6 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 0x7 > > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SHUTDOWN 0x8 > > As Mike said legacy is a bit of a weird name. I think this should > be SBI01_* or so. And pleae align the numeric values and maybe use > an enum. > > > + > > +#define SBI_CALL_LEGACY(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({ \ > > register uintptr_t a0 asm ("a0") = (uintptr_t)(arg0); \ > > register uintptr_t a1 asm ("a1") = (uintptr_t)(arg1); \ > > register uintptr_t a2 asm ("a2") = (uintptr_t)(arg2); \ > > Instead of the weird inline assembly with forced register allocation, > why not move this to pure assembly? AFAICs this is the whole assembly > code we'd need: > > ENTRY(sbi01_call) > ecall > END(sbi01_call)
Actually we'll need a mv to a7 for the function id, but the point still stands.
| |