lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 09:32:23PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:16 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello, Joel,
> > > >
> > > > I reworked the commit log as follows, but was then unsuccessful in
> > > > working out which -rcu commit to apply it to. Could you please
> > > > tell me what commit to apply this to? (Once applied, git cherry-pick
> > > > is usually pretty good about handling minor conflicts.)
> > >
> > > It was originally based on v5.3-rc2
> > >
> > > I was able to apply it just now to the rcu -dev branch and I pushed it here:
> > > https://github.com/joelagnel/linux-kernel.git (branch paul-dev)
> > >
> > > Let me know if any other issues, thanks for the change log rework!
> >
> > Pulled and cherry-picked, thank you!
> >
> > Just for grins, I also pushed out a from-joel.2019.08.16a showing the
> > results of the pull. If you pull that branch, then run something like
> > "gitk v5.3-rc2..", and then do the same with branch "dev", comparing the
> > two might illustrate some of the reasons for the current restrictions
> > on pull requests and trees subject to rebase.
>
> Right, I did the compare and see what you mean. I guess sending any
> future pull requests against Linux -next would be the best option?

Hmmm... You really want to send some pull requests, don't you? ;-)

Suppose you had sent that pull request against Linux -next or v5.2
or wherever. What would happen next, given the high probability of a
conflict with someone else's patch? What would the result look like?

Thanx, Paul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-17 05:57    [W:0.060 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site