Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] PM / ACPI: sleep: Additional changes related to suspend-to-idle | From | "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <> | Date | Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:25:16 +0530 |
| |
Hi Rafael
On 02-Aug-19 4:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > >>> On top of the "Simplify the suspend-to-idle control flow" patch series >>> posted previously: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/71085220.z6FKkvYQPX@kreacher/ >>> >>> sanitize the suspend-to-idle flow even further. >>> >>> First off, decouple EC wakeup from the LPS0 _DSM processing (patch 1). >>> >>> Next, reorder the code to invoke LPS0 _DSM Functions 5 and 6 in the >>> specification-compliant order with respect to suspending and resuming >>> devices (patch 2). >>> >>> Finally, rearrange lps0_device_attach() (patch 3) and add a command line >>> switch to prevent the LPS0 _DSM from being used. >> The v2 is because I found a (minor) bug in patch 1, decided to use a module >> parameter instead of a kernel command line option in patch 4. Also, there >> are 4 new patches: >> >> Patch 5: Switch the EC over to polling during "noirq" suspend and back >> during "noirq" resume. >> >> Patch 6: Eliminate acpi_sleep_no_ec_events(). >> >> Patch 7: Consolidate some EC code depending on PM_SLEEP. >> >> Patch 8: Add EC GPE dispatching debug message. > The v3 is just a rearranged v2 so as to move the post sensitive patch (previous patch 2) > to the end of the series. [After applying the full series the code is the same as before.] > > For easier testing, the series (along with some previous patches depended on by it) > is available in the pm-s2idle-testing branch of the linux-pm.git tree at kernel.org: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=pm-s2idle-testing > > Please refer to the changelogs for details.
I have tested both pm-s2idle-testing and pm-s2idle-rework branches including recently introduced commit "PM: suspend: Fix platform_suspend_prepare_noirq()".
Works fine for me on Ice Lake platform.
Acked-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
> Thanks, > Rafael > > >
| |