lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] perf diff: Report noisy for cycles diff
From
Date


On 8/12/2019 4:35 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 07:30:29AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +
>> + init_stats(&pair->diff.stats);
>> + init_spark_values(pair->diff.svals, NUM_SPARKS);
>> +
>> + for (int i = 0; i < pair->block_info->num; i++) {
>> + u64 val;
>> +
>> + if (i >= he->block_info->num || i >= NUM_SPARKS)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + val = labs(pair->block_info->cycles_spark[i] -
>> + he->block_info->cycles_spark[i]);
>> +
>> + update_spark_value(pair->diff.svals, NUM_SPARKS,
>> + &pair->diff.stats, val);
>> + update_stats(&pair->diff.stats, val);
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1250,6 +1292,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
>> "Show period values."),
>> OPT_BOOLEAN('F', "formula", &show_formula,
>> "Show formula."),
>> + OPT_BOOLEAN('n', "noisy", &show_noisy,
>> + "Show cycles noisy - WARNING: use only with -c cycles."),
>
> this should be more 'cycles' specific like --cycles-noisy or --cycles-hist?
>
> also I dont think we should use 'n' for this, just the long option
>
> jirka
>

Yes, it's cycles specific. Maybe --cycles-hist is better and the long
option should be enough. We can reserve -n for future feature. :)

Thanks
Jin Yao

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-13 02:50    [W:0.374 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site