Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:07:30 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm: kmemleak: Use a memory pool for kmemleak object allocations |
| |
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:06:39 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> Following the discussions on v2 of this patch(set) [1], this series > takes slightly different approach: > > - it implements its own simple memory pool that does not rely on the > slab allocator > > - drops the early log buffer logic entirely since it can now allocate > metadata from the memory pool directly before kmemleak is fully > initialised > > - CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE option is renamed to > CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE > > - moves the kmemleak_init() call earlier (mm_init()) > > - to avoid a separate memory pool for struct scan_area, it makes the > tool robust when such allocations fail as scan areas are rather an > optimisation > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190727132334.9184-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com
Using the term "memory pool" is a little unfortunate, but better than using "mempool"!
The changelog doesn't answer the very first question: why not use mempools. Please send along a paragraph which explains this decision.
| |