Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:04:33 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] mm, thp: introduce FOLL_SPLIT_PMD |
| |
On 07/31, Song Liu wrote: > > > On Jul 31, 2019, at 8:18 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Now, I don't understand why do we need pmd_trans_unstable() after > > split_huge_pmd(huge-zero-pmd), but whatever reason we have, why can't we > > unify both cases? > > > > IOW, could you explain why the path below is wrong? > > I _think_ the following patch works (haven't fully tested yet). But I am not > sure whether this is the best. By separating the two cases, we don't duplicate > much code. And it is clear that the two cases are handled differently. > Therefore, I would prefer to keep these separate for now.
I disagree. I think this separation makes the code less readable/understandable. Exactly because it handles two cases differently and it is absolutely not clear why.
But I can't argue, please forget.
Oleg.
| |