lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drivers/macintosh/smu.c: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning (Building: powerpc):
>
> drivers/macintosh/smu.c: In function 'smu_queue_i2c':
> drivers/macintosh/smu.c:854:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
> drivers/macintosh/smu.c:855:2: note: here
> case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB:
> ^~~~
>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/macintosh/smu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> index 276065c888bc..23f1f41c8602 100644
> --- a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> +++ b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
> @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ int smu_queue_i2c(struct smu_i2c_cmd *cmd)
> break;
> case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED:
> cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;
> + /* fall through */
> case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_STDSUB:
> if (cmd->info.sublen > 3)
> return -EINVAL;

Why do we think it's an expected fall through? I can't really convince
myself from the surrounding code that it's definitely intentional.

cheers

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-30 16:29    [W:0.070 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site