Messages in this thread | | | From | Tri Vo <> | Date | Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:31:59 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5] PM / wakeup: show wakeup sources stats in sysfs |
| |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:06 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:26 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2019-07-30 15:17:55) > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 8:48:09 PM CEST Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Quoting Tri Vo (2019-07-30 11:39:34) > > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:46 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:45 AM Tri Vo <trong@android.com> wrote: > > > > > > > - Device registering the wakeup source is now the parent of the wakeup source. > > > > > > > Updated wakeup_source_register()'s signature and its callers accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > > > And I really don't like these changes. Especially having "wakeup" > > > > > > twice in the path. > > > > > > > > > > I can trim it down to /sys/class/wakeup/<ID>/. Does that sound good? > > > > > > > > Using the same prefix for the class and the device name is quite common. > > > > For example, see the input, regulator, tty, tpm, remoteproc, hwmon, > > > > extcon classes. I'd prefer it was left as /sys/class/wakeup/wakeupN. The > > > > class name could be changed to wakeup_source perhaps (i.e. > > > > /sys/class/wakeup_source/wakeupN)? > > > > > > Alternatively /sys/class/wakeup/wsN > > > > > > > Or /sys/class/wakeup/eventN? It's your bikeshed to paint. > > So actually the underlying problem here is that device_wakeup_enable() > tries to register a wakeup source and then attach it to the device to > avoid calling possibly sleeping functions under a spinlock. > > However, it should be possible to call wakeup_source_create(name) > first, then attach the wakeup source to the device (after checking for > presence), and then invoke wakeup_source_add() (after dropping the > lock). If the wakeup source virtual device registration is done in > wakeup_source_add(), that should avoid the problem altogether without > having to introduce extra complexity.
This addresses the issue with device_wakeup_enable(), but IIUC we still have the general problem of multiple devices having the same name, which leads to name collisions when identifying wakeup sources with the name only.
| |