lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: ioc3: Add driver for SGI IOC3 chip
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:47:16 +0100
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * On IP30 the RTC (a DS1687) is behind the IOC3 on the generic
> > + * ByteBus regions. We have to write the RTC address of interest to
> > + * IOC3_BYTEBUS_DEV1, then read the data from IOC3_BYTEBUS_DEV2.
> > + * rtc->regs already points to IOC3_BYTEBUS_DEV1.
> > + */
> > +#define IP30_RTC_ADDR(rtc) (rtc->regs)
> > +#define IP30_RTC_DATA(rtc) ((rtc->regs) + IOC3_BYTEBUS_DEV2 - IOC3_BYTEBUS_DEV1)
> > +
> > +static u8 ip30_rtc_read(struct ds1685_priv *rtc, int reg)
> > +{
> > + writeb((reg & 0x7f), IP30_RTC_ADDR(rtc));
> > + return readb(IP30_RTC_DATA(rtc));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ip30_rtc_write(struct ds1685_priv *rtc, int reg, u8 value)
> > +{
> > + writeb((reg & 0x7f), IP30_RTC_ADDR(rtc));
> > + writeb(value, IP30_RTC_DATA(rtc));
> > +}
>
> Why is this not in the RTC driver?

because rtc1685 is used in different systems and accessing the chip
differs between those systems.

> > +static struct ds1685_rtc_platform_data ip30_rtc_platform_data = {
> > + .bcd_mode = false,
> > + .no_irq = false,
> > + .uie_unsupported = true,
> > + .alloc_io_resources = true,
>
> > + .plat_read = ip30_rtc_read,
> > + .plat_write = ip30_rtc_write,
>
> Call-backs in a non-subsystem API is pretty ugly IMHO.

I agree

> Where are these called from?

drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1685.c

I could do the same as done for serial8250 and add an additional .c file
in drivers/rtc which handles this for SGI-IP30. Alexandre would this work
for you as well ?

> > +#define IOC3_SID(_name, _sid, _setup) \
> > + { \
> > + .name = _name, \
> > + .sid = (PCI_VENDOR_ID_SGI << 16) | IOC3_SUBSYS_ ## _sid, \
> > + .setup = _setup, \
> > + }
> > +
> > +static struct {
> > + const char *name;
> > + u32 sid;
> > + int (*setup)(struct ioc3_priv_data *ipd);
> > +} ioc3_infos[] = {
>
> IMHO it's neater if you separate the definition and static data part.

I don't quite understand what you mean here. Should I move the #define at
the beginning of the file ? Why is it neater ?

Thomas.

--
SUSE Linux GmbH
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-29 20:46    [W:0.080 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site