Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched/deadline: Cleanup on_dl_rq() handling | From | Valentin Schneider <> | Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:37:29 +0100 |
| |
On 26/07/2019 09:27, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Remove BUG_ON() in __enqueue_dl_entity() since there is already one in > enqueue_dl_entity(). > > Move the check that the dl_se is not on the dl_rq from > __dequeue_dl_entity() to dequeue_dl_entity() to align with the enqueue > side and use the on_dl_rq() helper function. > > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > --- > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > index 1fa005f79307..a9cb52ceb761 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > @@ -1407,8 +1407,6 @@ static void __enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) > struct sched_dl_entity *entry; > int leftmost = 1; > > - BUG_ON(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node)); > - > while (*link) { > parent = *link; > entry = rb_entry(parent, struct sched_dl_entity, rb_node); > @@ -1430,9 +1428,6 @@ static void __dequeue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) > { > struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se); > > - if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node)) > - return; > -
Any idea why a similar error leads to a BUG_ON() in the enqueue path but only a silent return on the dequeue path? I would expect the handling to be almost identical.
| |