Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v12 1/5] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework | From | Dan Murphy <> | Date | Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:36:02 -0500 |
| |
Hello
On 7/24/19 1:47 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:14:14AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Hello >> >> On 7/10/19 7:08 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> On 6/17/19 10:09 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>> Marc >>>> >>>> On 6/10/19 11:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>> Bump >>>>> >>>>> On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>> Marc >>>>>> >>>>>> Bump >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/31/19 6:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>> Marc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>>> Marc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/9/19 11:11 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>>>>>>>> Create a m_can platform framework that peripheral >>>>>>>>> devices can register to and use common code and register sets. >>>>>>>>> The peripheral devices may provide read/write and configuration >>>>>>>>> support of the IP. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> v12 - Update the m_can_read/write functions to >>>>>>>>> create a backtrace if the callback >>>>>>>>> pointer is NULL. - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052302/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this able to be merged now? >>>>>>> ping >>>> Wondering if there is anything else we need to do? >>>> >>>> The part has officially shipped and we had hoped to have driver >>>> support in Linux as part of the announcement. >>>> >>> Is this being sent in a PR for 5.3? >>> >>> Dan >>> >> Adding Greg to this thread as I have no idea what is going on with this. > Why me? What am I supposed to do here? I see no patches at all to do > anything with :(
I am not sure who to email. The maintainer seems to be on hiatus or super busy with other work.
So I added you to see if you know how to handle this. Wolfgang Acked it but he said Marc needs to pull
it in. We have quite a few users of this patchset. I have been hosting the patchset in a different tree.
These users keep pinging us for upstream status and all we can do is point them to the
LKML to show we are continuing to pursue inclusion.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=393454
Thanks Dan
> > thanks, > > greg "not a miracle worker" k-h
| |