lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Update Qualcomm SDM845 DT bindings
From
Date

On 7/24/2019 11:27 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting David Dai (2019-07-24 10:22:57)
>> The way that I view this is that the consumers consume both bandwidth
>> and QoS from these physical NoC devices by getting some path between two
>> endpoints on these different NoCs and applying some constraints. The NoC
>> providers can accomplish that either by writing to MMIO spaces or by
>> talking to some remote processor/hardware to tune its clock speed. The
>> consumer doesn't interact with the RSCs directly, but can select a
>> different bcm voter based on the endpoints that are associated with a
>> particular bcm(apps or disp rsc). Each node(endpoints) will have its own
>> BCM designation and an unique bcm voter.
> Ok. I get it now. The MMIO nodes will be interconnect providers and
> they'll know what RSCs they can use by exposing the same RSC "resource"
> multiple times for each RSC that can be targeted? This is what the
> postfix is with _DISP on your examples? Presumably there's an _APPS
> version of the same prefixed endpoint in case the consumer wants to use
> the APPS RSC instead of the DISP one, or maybe there's just no postfix
> in this case because APPS is the "default".

Right, the suffixes will denote the RSC association and will default to
APPS otherwise.

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-24 22:44    [W:0.067 / U:1.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site