Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:47:11 +0200 | From | Michal Koutný <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] numa: introduce per-cgroup numa balancing locality, statistic |
| |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:41:36AM +0800, 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > Actually whatever the memory node sets or cpu allow sets is, it will > take effect on task's behavior regarding memory location and cpu > location, while the locality only care about the results rather than > the sets. My previous response missed much of the context, so it was a bit off.
I see what you mean by the locality now. Alas, I can't assess whether it's the right thing to do regarding NUMA behavior that you try to optimize (i.e. you need an answer from someone more familiar with NUMA balancing).
Michal
| |