lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] drivers: spi: core: Add optional stall delay between cs_change transfers
    Date
    On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 15:12 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
    > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:34:38PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
    > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:13:25 +0300
    > > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Some devices like the ADIS16460 IMU require a stall period between
    > > > transfers, i.e. between when the CS is de-asserted and re-asserted. The
    > > > default value of 10us is not enough. This change makes the delay
    > > > configurable for when the next CS change goes active.
    >
    > This looks like cs_change_delay.
    >
    > As documented in SubmittingPatches please send patches to the
    > maintainers for the code you would like to change. The normal kernel
    > workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't
    > copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more
    > difficult to apply patches.

    Ack.
    [Sorry for the late reply; I'm balancing other stuff as well and terrible at it]

    I'll probably update my practice to also include maintainers via --cc to `git send-email`.
    Up until now, I would send emails to lists [as much as possible] and try to not include people directly.
    My assumption was that the list is enough.

    I'm still adjusting to how things get done in the various Linux kernel subsystems/subgroups.
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2019-07-17 13:38    [W:2.971 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site