Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline | From | Dietmar Eggemann <> | Date | Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:29:32 +0200 |
| |
On 6/4/19 9:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> On 6/3/19 1:44 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:38:48AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 06:12:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>>> Scheduling-clock interrupts can arrive late in the CPU-offline process,
[...]
>>> 05981277a4de1ad6 ("arm64: Use common outgoing-CPU-notification code") >>> >>> ... but it looks like Paul's patch to do so [1] fell through the cracks; >>> I'm not aware of any reason that shouldn't have been taken. >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1431467407-1223-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com/ >>> >>> Paul, do you want to resend that? >> >> Please do. We're carrying this patch out-of-tree for while now in >> our EAS integration to get cpu hotplug tests passing on TC2 (arm). > > Huh. It still applies. But I have no means of testing it.
We can do the testing part on our TC2 platform, i.e. we're testing it with each of our EAS mainline integration right now.
https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/linux-kernel/energy-aware-scheduling/eas-mainline-development
http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-power.git;a=commit;h=8cd16f1dc2cd896a0b1e2010b4992b33fdc11fe0
> And it looks like the reason I dropped it was that I didn't get any > response from the maintainer. I sent a message to this effect to > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org and linux@arm.linux.org.uk on May > 21, 2015. > > So here it is again. ;-) > > I have queued this locally. Left to myself, I add the two of you on its > Cc: list and run it through my normal process. But given the history, > I would still want either an ack from the maintainer or, better, for > the maintainer to take the patch. > > Or is there a better way for us to proceed on this?
You could send this patch also to linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org and cc rmk to get his opinion on the patch.
[...]
| |