lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH HACK RFC] cpu: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline
From
Date
On 6/4/19 9:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 6/3/19 1:44 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:38:48AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 06:12:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> Scheduling-clock interrupts can arrive late in the CPU-offline process,

[...]

>>> 05981277a4de1ad6 ("arm64: Use common outgoing-CPU-notification code")
>>>
>>> ... but it looks like Paul's patch to do so [1] fell through the cracks;
>>> I'm not aware of any reason that shouldn't have been taken.
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1431467407-1223-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>>>
>>> Paul, do you want to resend that?
>>
>> Please do. We're carrying this patch out-of-tree for while now in
>> our EAS integration to get cpu hotplug tests passing on TC2 (arm).
>
> Huh. It still applies. But I have no means of testing it.

We can do the testing part on our TC2 platform, i.e. we're testing it
with each of our EAS mainline integration right now.

https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/linux-kernel/energy-aware-scheduling/eas-mainline-development

http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-power.git;a=commit;h=8cd16f1dc2cd896a0b1e2010b4992b33fdc11fe0

> And it looks like the reason I dropped it was that I didn't get any
> response from the maintainer. I sent a message to this effect to
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org and linux@arm.linux.org.uk on May
> 21, 2015.
>
> So here it is again. ;-)
>
> I have queued this locally. Left to myself, I add the two of you on its
> Cc: list and run it through my normal process. But given the history,
> I would still want either an ack from the maintainer or, better, for
> the maintainer to take the patch.
>
> Or is there a better way for us to proceed on this?

You could send this patch also to linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
and cc rmk to get his opinion on the patch.

[...]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-04 15:30    [W:0.065 / U:1.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site