Messages in this thread | | | From | Alexei Starovoitov <> | Date | Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:57:08 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] bpf: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF code |
| |
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > > Objtool previously ignored ___bpf_prog_run() because it didn't > understand the jump table. This resulted in the ORC unwinder not being > able to unwind through non-JIT BPF code. > > Now that objtool knows how to read jump tables, remove the whitelist and > rename the variable to "jump_table" so objtool can recognize it. > > Fixes: d15d356887e7 ("perf/x86: Make perf callchains work without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER") > Reported-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> > --- > kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c > index 080e2bb644cc..ff66294882f8 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c > @@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) > { > #define BPF_INSN_2_LBL(x, y) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y] = &&x##_##y > #define BPF_INSN_3_LBL(x, y, z) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y | BPF_##z] = &&x##_##y##_##z > - static const void *jumptable[256] = { > + static const void *jump_table[256] = { > [0 ... 255] = &&default_label, > /* Now overwrite non-defaults ... */ > BPF_INSN_MAP(BPF_INSN_2_LBL, BPF_INSN_3_LBL), > @@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) > #define CONT_JMP ({ insn++; goto select_insn; }) > > select_insn: > - goto *jumptable[insn->code]; > + goto *jump_table[insn->code];
I thought we were clear that it is a nack? Either live it alone or rename to something like jump_table_bpf_interpreter or bpf_interpreter_jump_table.
| |