lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Clean up crypto documentation
Date
On 6/25/19 8:52 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:33:27 +0000
> Gary R Hook <ghook@amd.com> wrote:
>
>>> It's been "valid" since I wrote it...it's just not upstream yet :) I
>>> expect it to be in 5.3, though. So the best way to refer to a kernel
>>> function, going forward, is just function() with no markup needed.
>>
>> So I'm unclear:
>>
>> 1) would you prefer I wait on your 5.3 change being fully committed,
>> 2) add your change to my local tree and use it, then submit an update
>> patchset that depends upon it, or
>> 3) re-submit now (using the current method) with suggested changes?
>
> I would just not mark up function() at all, and the right thing will
> happen to it in the very near future.

Done.

I applied your two patches (locally) to verify the result, and it looks
good to me. In the interim, I think it's NBD.

Thanks much.

grh
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-25 17:30    [W:0.047 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site