lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 4/5] cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework
On 18-06-19, 01:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> One more thing.
>
> handle_update() is very similar to cpufreq_update_freq_work().
>
> Why are both of them needed?

I probably did that because of locking required in cpufreq_update_freq_work()
but maybe I can do better. Lemme try and come back on it.

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-18 13:34    [W:0.137 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site