lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Disable lockref on arm64
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:47:19AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> remaining question Will had was whether it makes sense to do the
> condition checks before doing the actual store, to avoid having a time
> window where the refcount assumes its illegal value. Since arm64 does
> not have memory operands, the instruction count wouldn't change, but
> it will definitely result in a performance hit on out-of-order CPUs.

What do the races end up looking like? Is it possible to have two
threads ordered in a way that a second thread could _un_saturate a
counter?

CPU 1 CPU 2
inc()
load INT_MAX-1
about to overflow?
yes
dec()
load INT_MAX-1
set to INT_MAX
set to INT_MAX-2

Or would you use the same INT_MIN/2 saturation point done on x86?

As for performance, it should be easy to measure with the LKDTM test
to find out exactly the differences.

--
Kees Cook

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-15 16:00    [W:0.137 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site