Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:02:41 -0500 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] signal: Teach sigsuspend to use set_user_sigmask |
| |
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
> On 06/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Personally I don't think anyone sane would intentionally depend on this >> and I don't think there is a sufficiently reliable way to depend on this >> by accident that people would actually be depending on it. > > Agreed. > > As I said I like these changes and I see nothing wrong. To me they fix the > current behaviour, or at least make it more consistent. > > But perhaps this should be documented in the changelog? To make it clear > that this change was intentional.
Good point. I had not documented it because I thought I was only disabling an optimization.
Eric
| |