lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/4] backlight: pwm_bl: compute brightness of LED linearly to human eye.
Hi Pavel,

On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 11:02:26PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > + * Note that this method is based on empirical testing on different
> > > + * devices with PWM of 8 and 16 bits of resolution.
> > > + */
> > > + n = period;
> > > + while (n) {
> > > + counter += n % 2;
> > > + n >>= 1;
> > > + }
> >
> > I don't quite follow the heuristics above. Are you sure the number of
> > PWM bits can be infered from the period? What if the period value (in
> > ns) doesn't directly correspond to a register value? And even if it
> > did, counting the number of set bits (the above loops is a
> > re-implementation of ffs()) doesn't really result in the dividers
> > mentioned in the comment. E.g. a period of 32768 ns (0x8000) results
> > in a divider of 1, i.e. 32768 brighness levels.
> >
> > On veyron minnie the period is 1000000 ns, which results in 142858
> > levels (1000000 / 7)!
> >
> > Not sure if there is a clean solution using heuristics, a DT property
> > specifying the number of levels could be an alternative. This could
> > also be useful to limit the number of (mostly) redundant levels, even
> > the intended max of 4096 seems pretty high.
> >
> > Another (not directly related) observation is that on minnie the
> > actual brightness at a nominal 50% is close to 0 (duty cycle ~3%). I
> > haven't tested with other devices, but I wonder if it would make
> > sense to have an option to drop the bottom N% of levels, since the
> > near 0 brightness in the lower 50% probably isn't very useful in most
> > use cases, but maybe it looks different on other devices.
>
> Eye percieves logarithm(duty cycle), mostly, and I find very low brightness
> levels quite useful when trying to use machine in dark room.

I realized that the brightness level display on Chrome OS (= my test
device) is non-linear, and it isn't actually the lower 50% of levels
that is near 0 brightness, but 'only' about 20%.

> But yes, specifying if brightness is linear or exponential would be quite
> useful.

Agreed, this could help userspace with displaying a reasonable
brightness level.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-10 22:53    [W:0.103 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site