Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Date | Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:44:11 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] Include linux ACPI docs into Sphinx TOC tree |
| |
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:26 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 18:42:59 +0200 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Hardware guide > > > > This is more about documenting the expectations regarding the platform > > firmware, so what about firmware-guide instead? > > I had imagined a slightly wider focus, but this seems OK for now. We can > always rename it later :) > > > So what about this: > > > > - Create a new firmware-guide under Documentation and add an acpi/ > > directory to it for starters. Put the following files into it: > > > > acpi-lid > > aml-debugger > > debug (ditto) > > DSD-properties-rules > > gpio-properties > > i2c-muxes > > > > - Add an acpi/ subdirectory to Documentation/admin-guide and put the > > following files into it: > > > > cppc_sysfs > > initrd_table_override > > dsdt-override > > I do wonder if, rather than creating a new directory, we shouldn't just > make a single acpi.rst and put that information into it? > > > - Add an acpi/ subdirectory to Documentation/driver-api and put the > > following files into it: > > > > enumeration > > scan_handlers > > ...and something similar here? I guess that would be my preference, but I > don't feel all that strongly about it if there's reasons to do otherwise.
The primary reason would be to retain the correspondence between the old and the new files.
I guess they could be combined, but that would be two sort of different changes in one go.
> In general the plan seems good.
OK, thanks!
Cheers, Rafael
| |