Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 6 Apr 2019 00:00:40 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [patch V2 17/29] x86/exceptions: Disconnect IST index and stack order |
| |
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > +/* > > + * The exception stack ordering in [cea_]exception_stacks > > + */ > > +enum exception_stack_ordering { > > + ISTACK_DF, > > + ISTACK_NMI, > > + ISTACK_DB, > > + ISTACK_MCE, > > + N_EXCEPTION_STACKS > > +}; > > While clever, it reads as "interrupt stack" to me. ESTACK or IST_STACK > would be infinitely better.
Fair enough.
| |