lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usbip: vhci_hcd: Mark expected switch fall-through
From
Date
On 4/30/19 9:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:05:51AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/29/19 9:44 AM, David Laight wrote:
>>> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
>>>> Sent: 29 April 2019 15:40
>>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>>>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>> ...
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
>>>> index 667d9c0ec905..000ab7225717 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
>>>> @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int vhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
>>>> case USB_PORT_FEAT_U1_TIMEOUT:
>>>> usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(
>>>> " SetPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_U1_TIMEOUT\n");
>>>> + /* Fall through */
>>>> case USB_PORT_FEAT_U2_TIMEOUT:
>>>> usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(
>>>> " SetPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_U2_TIMEOUT\n");
>>>
>>> That doesn't look right, both debug messages seem to get printed.
>>>
>>
>> At first sight, I thought the same way, then I took a look into
>> commit:
>>
>> 1c9de5bf428612458427943b724bea51abde520a
>>
>> and noticed that the original developer properly added fall-through
>> comments in other places in the same switch() code, that gave me the
>> impression he knew what he was doing; then I noticed the following
>> error message in case USB_PORT_FEAT_U2_TIMEOUT:
>>
>> if (hcd->speed != HCD_USB3) {
>> pr_err("USB_PORT_FEAT_U1/2_TIMEOUT req not "
>> "supported for USB 2.0 roothub\n");
>> goto error;
>> }
>>
>> this error message is what makes me think the fall-through is
>> intentional; otherwise I think it would look like this instead:
>>
>> if (hcd->speed != HCD_USB3) {
>> pr_err("USB_PORT_FEAT_U2_TIMEOUT req not "
>> "supported for USB 2.0 roothub\n");
>> goto error;
>> }
>
> I think you are right, that's horrid, but correct :(

Yes. This hub_control is poorly organized and could use cleanup.
>
> Will go queue this up, thanks.
>

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks Greg!. It is on my list of things to Ack today.

-- Shuah

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-30 17:49    [W:0.053 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site