lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ELAN touchpad i2c_hid bugs fix
From
Date
at 22:08, <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 11:18 PM
>> To: Limonciello, Mario
>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko; hdegoede@redhat.com; benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com;
>> hotwater438@tutanota.com; jikos@kernel.org; swboyd@chromium.org;
>> bigeasy@linutronix.de; dtor@chromium.org; linux-input@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELAN touchpad i2c_hid bugs fix
>>
>>
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 2, 2019, at 5:37 AM, <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>
>>> <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 4:48 AM
>>>> To: Kai-Heng Feng; Limonciello, Mario
>>>> Cc: Hans de Goede; Benjamin Tissoires; hotwater438@tutanota.com; Jiri
>>>> Kosina;
>>>> Stephen Boyd; Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; Dmitry Torokhov; open list:HID
>>>> CORE
>>>> LAYER; lkml
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELAN touchpad i2c_hid bugs fix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>>>
>>>> +Cc: Mario
>>>>
>>>> Mario, do you have any insights about the issue with touchpad on Dell
>>>> system described below?
>>>
>>> My apologies, this got lost while I was on vacation.
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:08 AM Kai-Heng Feng
>>>> <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>> at 01:18, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:55 PM Kai-Heng Feng
>>>>>> <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> at 23:39, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/20/19 3:37 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Benjamin, what I find interesting here is that the BOGUS_IRQ quirk
>>>>>>>> is also used on Elan devices, I suspect that these Elan devices
>>>>>>>> likely also need the I2C_HID_QUIRK_FORCE_TRIGGER_FALLING quirk
>>>>>>>> and then they probably will no longer need the bogus IRQ flag,
>>>>>>>> if you know about bugreports with an acpidump for any of the devices
>>>>>>>> needing the bogus IRQ quirk, then I (or you) can check how the IRQ
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> declared there, I suspect it will be declared as level-low, just
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> with the laptop this patch was written for. And it probably need to
>>>>>>>> be edge-falling instead of level-low just like this case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First, I’ve already tried using IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, unfortunately
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> doesn’t solve the issue for me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I talked to Elan once, and they confirm the correct IRQ trigger is
>>>>>>> level
>>>>>>> low. So forcing falling trigger may break other platforms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I understood Vladislav the quirk he got from Elan as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, then this is really weird.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recently we found that Elan touchpad doesn’t like GpioInt() from its
>>>>>>> _CRS.
>>>>>>> Once the Interrupt() is used instead, the issue goes away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC i2c core tries to get interrupt from Interrupt() resource and
>>>>>> then falls back to GpioInt().
>>>>>> See i2c_acpi_get_info() and i2c_device_probe().
>>>>>
>>>>> Here’s its ASL:
>>>>>
>>>>> Scope (\_SB.PCI0.I2C4)
>>>>> {
>>>>> Device (TPD0)
>>>>> {
>>>>> Name (_ADR, One) // _ADR: Address
>>>>> Name (_HID, "DELL08AE") // _HID: Hardware ID
>>>>> Name (_CID, "PNP0C50" /* HID Protocol Device (I2C bus) */) // _CID:
>>>> Compatible ID
>>>>> Name (_UID, One) // _UID: Unique ID
>>>>> Name (_S0W, 0x04) // _S0W: S0 Device Wake State
>>>>> Name (SBFB, ResourceTemplate ()
>>>>> {
>>>>> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x002C, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
>>>>> AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C4",
>>>>> 0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
>>>>> )
>>>>> })
>>>>> Name (SBFG, ResourceTemplate ()
>>>>> {
>>>>> GpioInt (Level, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullUp, 0x0000,
>>>>> "\\_SB.GPO1", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
>>>>> )
>>>>> { // Pin list
>>>>> 0x0012
>>>>> }
>>>>> })
>>>>> Name (SBFI, ResourceTemplate ()
>>>>> {
>>>>> Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, ,, )
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x0000003C,
>>>>> }
>>>>> })
>>>>> Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized) // _INI: Initialize
>>>>> {
>>>>> }
>>>>> Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) // _STA: Status
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((TCPD == One))
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (0x0F)
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Return (Zero)
>>>>> }
>>>>> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((OSYS < 0x07DC))
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (SBFI) /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C4.TPD0.SBFI */
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Return (ConcatenateResTemplate (SBFB, SBFG))
>>>>> }
>>>>> Method (_DSM, 4, NotSerialized) // _DSM: Device-Specific Method
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((Arg0 == ToUUID ("3cdff6f7-4267-4555-ad05-b30a3d8938de") /*
>> HID
>>>> I2C Device */))
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((Arg2 == Zero))
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((Arg1 == One))
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (Buffer (One)
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x03 // .
>>>>> })
>>>>> }
>>>>> Else
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (Buffer (One)
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x00 // .
>>>>> })
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> ElseIf ((Arg2 == One))
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (0x20)
>>>>> }
>>>>> Else
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (Buffer (One)
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x00 // .
>>>>> })
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> ElseIf ((Arg0 == ToUUID ("ef87eb82-f951-46da-84ec-14871ac6f84b")))
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((Arg2 == Zero))
>>>>> {
>>>>> If ((Arg1 == One))
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (Buffer (One)
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x03 // .
>>>>> })
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> If ((Arg2 == One))
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (ConcatenateResTemplate (SBFB, SBFG))
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Return (Buffer (One)
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x00 // .
>>>>> })
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> Else
>>>>> {
>>>>> Return (Buffer (One)
>>>>> {
>>>>> 0x00 // .
>>>>> })
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Change SBFG to SBFI in its _CRS can workaround the issue.
>>>>> Is ASL in this form possible to do the flow you described?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kai-Heng
>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I am not sure how to patch its DSDT/SSDT in i2c-hid.
>>>
>>> Is this pre-production HW? If so, maybe this is a case that we should
>>> talk
>>> about custom OSI string to run the ASL differently.
>>
>> Some are already shipped.
>>
>>
>>> The other option would be to create a new ASL method in FW and from Linux
>>> side a quirk that calls this new ASL method.
>>
>> Since this patch is for ASUS Laptop, I think a more generic solution from
>> driver layer is preferred.
>
> I thought this ASL was from Dell laptop. The HID make it looks like it
> at least.

Yes this ASL is from a Dell system.

>>>>> Name (_HID, "DELL08AE") // _HID: Hardware ID
>
> In general more generic solution from driver layer is preferred I agree.
> You might
> need to check with ACPI guys to see if they have some ideas on situations
> that
> GpioInt fail.

I’ve filed a bug here but we don’t find any proper solution:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201311

Kai-Heng

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-03 11:25    [W:0.112 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site