lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Docs: An initial automarkup extension for sphinx
Date
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> I am not at all opposed to a more proper solution that might, in the
> long term, produce more deterministic results. I can even try to work in
> that direction. But this is something that can be done now that, IMO,
> doesn't in any way close off a better implementation in the future. If we
> agree that we should automatically generate references for occurrences of
> "function()", we can change how that is actually done later.
>
> I'll look into this further, but my inclination is to go forward with what
> I have now. It's simple and easy to understand, and doesn't seem to screw
> up anywhere in the current body of kernel docs as far as I can tell.

Fair enough. It's most important that this doesn't block us from
switching to a different implementation later once someone figures it
out.

BR,
Jani.


--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-26 21:00    [W:0.050 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site