lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v20 00/28] Intel SGX1 support
    From
    Date
    On 4/19/19 9:24 AM, Dr. Greg wrote:
    >> Companies ideally shouldn't be getting their customers hooked on
    >> out-of-tree ABIs and customers should consume out-of-tree ABIs
    >> *expecting* them to break in the future.
    > At the risk of being indelicate, it was your company that hooked the
    > SGX development community on out-of-tree driver ABI's and software.

    I would encourage anyone who has been impacted by this to communicate
    that back to the folks at Intel from whom they received the out-of-tree
    code about the impact.

    > Is there going to be an OEM mandated requirement, enforced by Intel
    > licensing, that all SGX capable platforms will implement Flexible
    > Launch Control?
    Heck if I know. I don't think LKML is a great place to discuss Intel
    licensing requirements.

    What I *do* know is that when builds a platform without Flexible Launch
    Control, Linux does not support SGX on that platform. I guess that
    could be spelled out in some documentation explicitly, if it isn't already.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2019-04-19 21:39    [W:4.136 / U:0.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site