Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] soundwire: fix style issues | From | Pierre-Louis Bossart <> | Date | Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:09:59 -0500 |
| |
>> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/soundwire/Kconfig | 2 +- >> drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 87 ++++++++-------- >> drivers/soundwire/bus.h | 16 +-- >> drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c | 4 +- >> drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.c | 87 ++++++++-------- >> drivers/soundwire/cadence_master.h | 22 ++-- >> drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 87 ++++++++-------- >> drivers/soundwire/intel.h | 4 +- >> drivers/soundwire/intel_init.c | 12 +-- >> drivers/soundwire/mipi_disco.c | 116 +++++++++++---------- >> drivers/soundwire/slave.c | 10 +- >> drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 161 +++++++++++++++-------------- > > I would prefer this to be a patch per module. It doesnt help to have a > single patch for all the files! > > It would be great to have cleanup done per logical group, for example > typos in a patch, aligns in another etc...
You've got to be kidding. I've never seen people ask for this sort of detail.
> >> 12 files changed, 313 insertions(+), 295 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig >> index 19c8efb9a5ee..84876a74874f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/Kconfig >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ >> >> menuconfig SOUNDWIRE >> bool "SoundWire support" >> - ---help--- >> + help > > Not sure if this is a style issue, kernel seems to have 2990 instances > of this!
this is reported by checkpatch.pl --strict.
> >> if (msg->page) >> sdw_reset_page(bus, msg->dev_num); >> @@ -243,7 +244,7 @@ int sdw_transfer(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct sdw_msg *msg) >> * Caller needs to hold the msg_lock lock while calling this >> */ >> int sdw_transfer_defer(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct sdw_msg *msg, >> - struct sdw_defer *defer) >> + struct sdw_defer *defer) > > this does not seem aligned to me!
It is, I checked. 2 tabs and 7 spaces.
> >> int sdw_fill_msg(struct sdw_msg *msg, struct sdw_slave *slave, >> - u32 addr, size_t count, u16 dev_num, u8 flags, u8 *buf) >> + u32 addr, size_t count, u16 dev_num, u8 flags, u8 *buf) > > this one too
2 tabs and one space.
> >> @@ -458,13 +458,13 @@ static int sdw_assign_device_num(struct sdw_slave *slave) >> mutex_unlock(&slave->bus->bus_lock); >> if (dev_num < 0) { >> dev_err(slave->bus->dev, "Get dev_num failed: %d", >> - dev_num); >> + dev_num); > > It might read better if we move the log to second line along with > dev_num... > >> int sdw_configure_dpn_intr(struct sdw_slave *slave, >> - int port, bool enable, int mask) >> + int port, bool enable, int mask) > > not aligned
it is in the code. It's a diff illusion.
> >> void sdw_extract_slave_id(struct sdw_bus *bus, >> - u64 addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id); >> + u64 addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id); >> > > Not aligned
it is in the code. It's a diff illusion.
> >> enum sdw_command_response >> cdns_xfer_msg_defer(struct sdw_bus *bus, >> - struct sdw_msg *msg, struct sdw_defer *defer) >> + struct sdw_msg *msg, struct sdw_defer *defer) > > this one too.. > >> static int cdns_port_params(struct sdw_bus *bus, >> - struct sdw_port_params *p_params, unsigned int bank) >> + struct sdw_port_params *p_params, unsigned int bank) > > here as well.. (and giving up on rest)
Please check for yourself that this is a diff illusion w/ tab space.
| |