Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.14 59/69] arm64: backtrace: Dont bother trying to unwind the userspace stack | Date | Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:59:17 +0200 |
| |
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
commit 1e6f5440a6814d28c32d347f338bfef68bc3e69d upstream.
Calling dump_backtrace() with a pt_regs argument corresponding to userspace doesn't make any sense and our unwinder will simply print "Call trace:" before unwinding the stack looking for user frames.
Rather than go through this song and dance, just return early if we're passed a user register state.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 1149aad10b1e ("arm64: Add dump_backtrace() in show_regs") Reported-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c @@ -145,10 +145,16 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk) { struct stackframe frame; - int skip; + int skip = 0; pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk); + if (regs) { + if (user_mode(regs)) + return; + skip = 1; + } + if (!tsk) tsk = current; @@ -169,7 +175,6 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs frame.graph = tsk->curr_ret_stack; #endif - skip = !!regs; printk("Call trace:\n"); while (1) { unsigned long stack; @@ -232,15 +237,13 @@ static int __die(const char *str, int er return ret; print_modules(); - __show_regs(regs); pr_emerg("Process %.*s (pid: %d, stack limit = 0x%p)\n", TASK_COMM_LEN, tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), end_of_stack(tsk)); + show_regs(regs); - if (!user_mode(regs)) { - dump_backtrace(regs, tsk); + if (!user_mode(regs)) dump_instr(KERN_EMERG, regs); - } return ret; }
| |